Spørgsmål til Boland

Postet af Bundgaard - 09 december 2008 18:13
Så blev det atter tirsdag og vi har vanen tro sendt en røvfuld spørgsmål af sted til Erik Bolands ugentlige chat.

Bundgaard: Hi Erik! Once again greetings from Denmark. Can you please explain to me why TJ only carried the ball 10 times against the 49ers? - I just don't get it! It's clear to everybody (except the coaching staff apparently?) that the Jets need to establish the run with TJ and LW instead of having Favre throwing all day long... didn't we learn that at the beginning of the season?

Boland: bundgaard, welcome back. mangini was asked that yesterday and his answer with just about every "what went wrong with the offense" question was that the Jets didn't have the ball enough because of the huge difference in time of possession, nearly 40 minutes to 20. There's some truth to that but it was overall another disjointed afternoon of playcalling

(...Fint nok Mangini, men kan en (stor) del af grunden til, at Jets tabte kampen om time of possession, ikke netop tilskrives at Jets forsømte at løbe bolde med Thomas Jones og Leon Washington?)

Rasmus: Who has the responsibility for the lack of involvement for Cotch and especially Coles over the last two games? Schottenheimer/Mangini, Favre or the two WRs themselves?

Boland: rasmus, schottenheimer calls the plays but ultimately any game plan is OK'd by mangini

Bundgaard: At the end of the game the announcers mentioned that the Jets receivers hadn't been able to get any kind of separation. Was that only the case against the 49ers or has that been a problem all season long?... They also said that therefore the CBs didn't respect the Jets passing attack (Clowney anyone?). What's your take on that?

Boland: bundgaard, it's been a season-long problem. and my take on clowney is the same as its been for the last six weeks since he came back from the shoulder injury: he needs to get a shot. he's the fastest offensive player on the team

Rasmus: We obviously have huge problems defending the pass. Which group(s) have the main responsibility for that? Inside pass rush, outside passrush, LB coverage, S coverage or CB coverage?

Boland: rasmus, in order of culpability (sp?): 1. secondary, (particularly covering the slot), 2. LB coverage (but a guy like pace isn't built to cover so in some ways it's not fair to blame him, 3. not enough pass rush

Etiketter: , ,

Flere nyheder og artikler

Velkommen til NewYorkJets.dk

NewYorkJets.dk er dit danske stoppested for nyheder om - og kommentarer til alt hvad der berører New York Jets. (mere)

Bloggen har eksisteret siden sommeren 2005 og er tænkt som et samlingspunkt for de danske Jetsfans, så giv endelig din mening til kende i kommentarfeltet til de enkelte poster!

Skulle du have mod på selv at poste nyheder og meninger her på bloggen, så er nye bloggere altid velkomne.

Har du kommentarer, spørgsmål eller gode ideer, så send en mail.

Du kan også finde NewYorkJets.dk på Facebook og på Twitter.

Abonner på NewYorkJets.dk

Nuværende skribenter på NewYorkJets.dk:

  • Mark Bundgaard Hansen
  • Rasmus Hansen
  • Mathias Oehlenschlæger
  • Jets-katten

Notice: We are in no way affiliated with New York Jets or the National Football league. This is an unofficial fan page

Nyhedsbrev

Indtast din email nedenfor og modtag et nyhedsbrev når der er nyt på siden. Vi sender max en mail om dagen og du kan altid framelde dig igen.

Tilmeld

Afstemning

Seneste kommentarer

    NewYorkJets.dk chat

    Social Media

    Støt os ved at "synes godt om" os på Facebook og modtag masser af opdatering om Jets.

    Vis din support for Gang Green ved at tilføje et NewYorkJets.dk badge til dit Facebook profil-billede.

    Følg os på Twitter

    NewYorkJets.dk podcasts

    Vi laver med jævne mellemrum Jets-relaterede podcasts omkring holdet, kampene og spillerne. Her er en liste over tidligere podcasts:

      NewYorkJets.dk arkiv

      Her kan du finde alle vores tidligere artikler. Genoplev sejrene og grin af os når vores spådomme blev gjort til skamme.

      J-E-T-S JETS! JETS! JETS!
      ...now let's go eat a goddamn snack!