Postet af Bundgaard - 24 oktober 2008 17:55
Sidste uge gik det ud over Rich Cimini... denne gang er det Erik Bolands tur.
Boland har nemlig netop afsluttet sin ugentlige live blog/chat og ligesom sidste uge sendte jeg tre spørgsmål af sted... og de blev alle besvaret.
Enten stiller jeg nogle infamt gode spørgsmål eller også er der bare ikke ret mange der sender spørgsmål ind...?
Anyways... here we go:
Bundgaard: Are the Jets in trouble if both Coles and Cotchery isn't ready to play sunday, or is Brad Smith and Chansi Stuckey capable of carrying the load?... an d how about Clowney whats his status?
Boland: bundgaard, i think the jets could line up myself, you and a few other contributors to this blog on sunday and beat the chiefs. i don't mean that flippantly, the chiefs are just really bad. in the bigger picture, bundgaard, the question is a good one but with smith's emergence and stuckey having shown consistent skills this season, the jets should be fine short-term. no question, this would be a major problem if both LC and J-Co were out. Clowney is about 95 % that he's going to dress Sunday. He's fine.
Bundgaard: There has been alot of talk/rumors about Favre helping the Lions game plan against the Packers this week. Has this been a distraction to the team and will it affect them on sunday?
Boland: bundgaard, not in the least. I never saw this as a "Jets" story to begin with and, as our NFL columnist bob glauber, called it, it was "a tempest in a teapot." i asked a couple of players about it and they just sort of laughed. they don't care. i'm not sure i do either!:)
- Jeg er enig med Boland. Det er en non-story og har ikke noget med Jets at gøre. Derfor har jeg heller ikke brugt tid på den her på bloggen.
Bundgard: After watching the offence struggle the last couple of weeks fans are blaming Schottenheimers game planning and play calling. Is that justified or does the problem lie somewhere else?
Boland: bundgaard, i think it's a combination of things. as i said, mangini gives the final thumbs up or thumbs down to what his coaches do in terms of game-planning, but i'd like to see schottenheimer take a more aggressive approach to things. i always come back to this: if you - meaning the Jets and not just schottenheimer - weren't willing to make changes in your philosophy when you made the deal for Favre, why exactly did you get him then?
Boland har nemlig netop afsluttet sin ugentlige live blog/chat og ligesom sidste uge sendte jeg tre spørgsmål af sted... og de blev alle besvaret.
Enten stiller jeg nogle infamt gode spørgsmål eller også er der bare ikke ret mange der sender spørgsmål ind...?
Anyways... here we go:
Bundgaard: Are the Jets in trouble if both Coles and Cotchery isn't ready to play sunday, or is Brad Smith and Chansi Stuckey capable of carrying the load?... an d how about Clowney whats his status?
Boland: bundgaard, i think the jets could line up myself, you and a few other contributors to this blog on sunday and beat the chiefs. i don't mean that flippantly, the chiefs are just really bad. in the bigger picture, bundgaard, the question is a good one but with smith's emergence and stuckey having shown consistent skills this season, the jets should be fine short-term. no question, this would be a major problem if both LC and J-Co were out. Clowney is about 95 % that he's going to dress Sunday. He's fine.
Bundgaard: There has been alot of talk/rumors about Favre helping the Lions game plan against the Packers this week. Has this been a distraction to the team and will it affect them on sunday?
Boland: bundgaard, not in the least. I never saw this as a "Jets" story to begin with and, as our NFL columnist bob glauber, called it, it was "a tempest in a teapot." i asked a couple of players about it and they just sort of laughed. they don't care. i'm not sure i do either!:)
- Jeg er enig med Boland. Det er en non-story og har ikke noget med Jets at gøre. Derfor har jeg heller ikke brugt tid på den her på bloggen.
Bundgard: After watching the offence struggle the last couple of weeks fans are blaming Schottenheimers game planning and play calling. Is that justified or does the problem lie somewhere else?
Boland: bundgaard, i think it's a combination of things. as i said, mangini gives the final thumbs up or thumbs down to what his coaches do in terms of game-planning, but i'd like to see schottenheimer take a more aggressive approach to things. i always come back to this: if you - meaning the Jets and not just schottenheimer - weren't willing to make changes in your philosophy when you made the deal for Favre, why exactly did you get him then?
Etiketter: Erik Boland, spørgsmål og svar
Flere nyheder og artikler
0 kommentarer 
